THE GROWTH EDGE
The Strategy Edge
People Strategy for Organizational Leaders
June 2026 • Issue #3
There’s a number I find myself coming back to in almost every conversation with a CEO about turnover: roughly 4 in 10 departures were preventable. Not preventable in the sense of “if only we’d paid more” — preventable in the sense that the warning signs were there for months and nobody acted on them. The research bears this out consistently, and so does my own experience walking into companies after a key person has left. The exit interview reads like a list of things the organization already knew.
What strikes me is how often the cause traces back to one of two places: a performance process that never gave the person honest feedback, or a manager relationship that quietly eroded. Both are fixable. Neither is expensive to fix relative to the cost of replacing the person. But both require admitting that retention isn’t a compensation problem to be solved with a spreadsheet — it’s a management and systems problem that shows up, eventually, as a resignation.
This issue recaps last month’s posts on exactly those two systems: the performance review process most companies have outgrown, and what a fractional CPO actually does week to week to take people decisions off a founder’s plate. The research section looks at what the latest retention data says about where the preventable losses are coming from — and at a newer wrinkle, the way AI rollouts are quietly eroding trust on teams that were functioning fine a year ago.
What We Published Last Month
Performance Reviews Everyone Hates: How to Fix Your Review Process
Only 14% of employees say performance reviews inspire them to improve, and 95% of managers are dissatisfied with how reviews work at their company. This post makes the case that the problem isn’t the concept — it’s that most review processes were designed for compliance, not development. It walks through the five structural failures behind a broken process and the five fixes, sequenced in the order that actually works, starting with calibration. If your December review cycle felt like theater, this is the redesign.
Read it: Performance Reviews Everyone Hates →
What a Fractional CPO Actually Does (And When You Need One)
CEOs have heard of fractional executives but rarely know what the day-to-day looks like. This post answers that directly — a month in the life of a fractional CPO advising a 180-person firm, the distinction between a fractional CPO and a consultant or interim executive, and a five-signal decision framework for knowing when it’s time. If you’re spending more than 15–20% of your week on people decisions, this is the post to read before your next hire.
Read it: What a Fractional CPO Actually Does →
Building Trust on a Leadership Team: It’s Slower Than You Think
For organizational leaders, this one is worth reading as a caution against the one-day offsite as a fix. A leadership team operating in silos is a business problem — it shows up as slow decisions, relitigated commitments, and information that doesn’t flow. This post explains why trust takes months of consistent behavior to build and a single meeting to break, and what the inflection point looks like when it finally develops. Useful framing if you’re tempted to schedule a team-building day and call it solved.
Read it: Building Trust on a Leadership Team →
Worth Knowing: What the Research Is Saying
Work Institute, 2026 Retention Report. The latest retention research continues to find that roughly 42% of employee departures are preventable, and that the largest controllable drivers are career development, manager quality, and the day-to-day work experience — not pay. Nearly 70% of workers say they would leave over a bad manager. The report’s central argument is that organizations don’t lack turnover data; they lack clarity about which drivers they can actually influence.
That last point is the one I’d put in front of a leadership team. It’s easy to treat turnover as a market force you absorb. But if four in ten exits were preventable, then four in ten exits are a management decision you’re making by default. The companies that get retention right aren’t paying the most — they’re the ones with a functioning performance process, a manager-development plan, and a habit of asking people why they’d stay before they’re already deciding to leave.
Gallup, 2026 Workplace Research. Gallup estimates that the annual cost of voluntary turnover is equivalent to roughly 5.6% of GDP when replacement, training, and lost-productivity costs are accounted for. High-engagement organizations see 21–51% lower turnover than low-engagement ones. And manager engagement — already down nine points since 2022 — remains the strongest single lever, because a disengaged manager produces a disengaged team.
For a growing company, the practical translation is that retention and management capability are the same investment. You can’t fix attrition with a one-time comp adjustment if the manager layer underneath is depleted. This is where a structured performance process and a senior people advisor earn their keep — not as HR overhead, but as the mechanism that keeps your most expensive asset from walking out with a competitor’s offer.
Harvard Business Review, February 2026. In a piece co-authored by Amy Edmondson, HBR flags an emerging dynamic: as teams integrate AI tools, overall team performance can decline even as individual productivity rises. People begin second-guessing their own judgment, and trust erodes in ways that are hard to pinpoint. The expected efficiency gains get offset by a quieter loss of the psychological safety that lets teams flag problems and challenge each other.
This is worth watching if your organization is rolling out AI tools this year. The instinct is to measure the rollout by individual output. The thing to actually watch is whether people still speak up — whether someone will say “the model got this wrong” or “I’m not confident in this output” without worrying about how it lands. Trust is the substrate that makes a team more than the sum of its tools, and it’s the first thing a poorly managed technology change quietly costs you.
Resource Spotlight
HR Readiness Checklist. Ten signs your company has outgrown its current HR setup — and what to do about each one. It’s the same diagnostic framework we use in the HR Department Assessment, and a useful self-check if last month’s fractional CPO post had you wondering whether your people function matches the work in front of it.
Get the HR Readiness Checklist →
Have a people challenge you’re trying to figure out?
Discovery calls are free, 30 minutes, and there’s no pitch — just an honest conversation about where you are, what you’re trying to solve, and whether outside help would actually move the needle.